A Vocabulary Problem: Eugenics and Down Syndrome

Apparently there is a newspaper columnist in the world, whose platform is to advocate vehemently and persistently for people with disabilities in general—and Down syndrome specifically—to die.

Well, apparently this person does not like the word eugenics to be associated with her point of view. She thinks the term eugenics has too many negative connotations. She believes, apparently, that ridding society of a class of people—if you have a “really good reason"—should have a happier sounding title.

And this person KNOWS they have a “really good reason" because they have observed dysfunctional families which include this class of people and it was…. bad….

There were struggles. And hardship.

Clearly this means that…..

ALL families who include this class of person are dysfunctional…. and bad….

So, she can’t help but conclude that…..

This class of people should be eliminated.

It isn’t exactly scientific, or even logical.

Life without disability is also fraught with difficulties and struggles—in fact, there is dignity and valor that cannot be achieved without struggling.

Apparently this authority has never observed that.

Supports for people with disabilities (like access to education, healthcare, employment, and life in the community) greatly reduces hardships for people with disabilities. (I have written about improvements in life with Down syndrome here.)

Support for dysfunctional families often improves that family's functioning.

But our friend has never observed these things either--which means they don't exist, naturally. Also.

Honestly, the first time I heard this person spew their drivel I thought it was a satire.

But no. She is serious.

Or, I should say, Serious (with a capital S.)

I will NOT link to this person, or even name them, because if they get even one blog-visit because of me I will not be able to live with myself. (But I read about her on this website!)

But I do hate to ignore a person in need.

And situations where one group of people deem themselves superior and decide that the folks they deem as “less” should be eliminated is hardly a new event. There must be lots of vocabulary available.

Eugenics according to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary is defined as “a science that deals with the improvement (as by control of human mating) of hereditary qualities of a race or breed.”

Oh my, that is an UGLY phrase…. With so much BAGGAGE...

Fortunately, bigotry is an OLD problem. I am sure we can come up with something else.

Let’s see, when a ‘superior’ group eliminates others based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation or some other difference are there other words used to describe the situation?

Try these: holocaust, pogrom, ethnic cleansing, persecution, genocide, extermination, hate crimes, abuse…. What did Idi Amin call it? What do they call it in Rwanda?

Help yourself to any of those words!

You're welcome.

Photo from here.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Blogging Against Disablism

Goldfish is hosting the annual Blogging Against Disableism Day--well, actually it was yesterday, but latecomers can be included--so here you go--stop over there and read up on the issues from all kinds of perspectives!

Sometimes when I give a presentation I use what I call my “bunch of balloons” format. I give the audience several bits of information which, taken singly, seem disconnected, but when held together in a bunch lifts us all to a conclusion.

Permit me to use this format today:

The first group of balloons we will take hold of will be about Down syndrome:

• Down syndrome is a genetic condition caused by an extra copy of chromosome #21 in a person’s cells.
• With advances in surgery for heart and digestive disorders, and the recognition of the role of hypothyroidism in Down syndrome, people are healthier and functioning at a higher level.
• The life expectancy for people with Down syndrome used to be 9 years, it is now 55, with some people living much longer. (PS: I don’t find this as worrisome as some folks do. I think the timing for this advance is perfect. With the aging of the baby-boomers our whole country is about to become EXPERTS at working with an aging population with increasing levels of disability—the work we have done creating accessibility for people who already have disabilities is laying the groundwork for successful aging for our entire population those with Down syndrome included!)
• It used to be believed and taught that people with Down syndrome could not read. Today we know that literacy at some level is an expectation for people with Down syndrome with decoding as a relative strength. It is suggested that many people will be able to read at a 4th grade level and some will read at above an 8th grade level. (Many newspapers are written at a 4th-6th grade level.)
• Today people with Down syndrome are going to school, getting jobs, getting married, buying houses and contributing to their communities in ways never thought possible just 40 years ago.
• Siblings of people with Down syndrome when studied report overall positive experiences.
• Disabilities that exist from birth happen in about 1 of every 33 births and among those Down syndrome is termed a low-incidence disability.

I could go on, but you get the picture: there are many indicators that the health, well-being and quality of life for people with Down syndrome have improved greatly in the last few decades.

Do you have these balloons tied around your wrist?

The next few balloons will be about something called Healthy People 2010.

Healthy People 2010 is a group of health goals agreed upon by the leaders in medicine and in the government. It lists many, many indicators of good health. These indicators guide funding and research, and they are analyzed and measured regularly to assess the country’s progress in health care.

The recent data shows that among many other things the following indicators are not improving or are actually getting worse:
• The number of preterm babies is up.
• The number of low birthweight babies is up.
• The number of C-sections—particularly those termed ‘convenience’ is way up. (Except in an emergency, risks of surgery are considered greater than risks of birth.)
• Infant mortality is improving, but remains higher than many other nations
• Maternal mortality is up.
• The racial and socioeconomic disparity in these figures is appalling.

(The dataset for these can be found here.)

(PS again: Because Down syndrome is a low-incidence disability it does NOT contribute significantly to these numbers.)

Got these balloons tied on?

The indicators on the quality of life for people with Down syndrome are improving immensely and the indicators on maternal and infant health are not.

Now, let’s talk about current events:
• Twice in the past 12 months a respected group of physicians has asserted the position that ALL pregnant women should undergo first trimester testing to rule out Down syndrome. (PS yet again—this of course was very powerful marketing of Down syndrome as terrible—a position obviously not supported by current data.)
• Studies show that physicians disclosure of Down syndrome to pregnant women with a negative bias (and you don’t even need the studies to surmise this: the abortion rate after receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome is 85-95% depending on who you read—if the information were unbiased wouldn’t the rate be MUCH closer to 50%??)
• These announcements about prenatal testing for Down syndrome made the evening news. I have not heard any such announcements about initiatives on decreasing the rate of C-sections…or improving maternal and infant health.
• Brian Skotko, MD, MPP, wrote a letter to the editor to the Journal of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology giving broader and a more positive perspective on Down syndrome. The journal declined to print it. (Read it here,)

Are you airborne? I am.

Frankly, I think some physicians and organizations have a lot of nerve. With all the real work they have to do in their field, I think taking on Down syndrome is a disgusting misuse of time and talent.

The conclusion that I am lifted to is that Disableism definitely exists and it exists in very influential places. It is unbelievable and it is nasty. And if Disableism is so pervasive in an area where there is as much success as there’s been with Down syndrome, no one is safe.

So, who’s next?